Merge pull request '[gitea] v1.21 cherry-pick' (#2407) from earl-warren/forgejo:wip-v1.21-gitea-cherry-pick into v1.21/forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2407 Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
This commit is contained in:
commit
ceca25d374
8 changed files with 203 additions and 22 deletions
12
cmd/serv.go
12
cmd/serv.go
|
@ -216,16 +216,18 @@ func runServ(c *cli.Context) error {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// LowerCase and trim the repoPath as that's how they are stored.
|
||||
repoPath = strings.ToLower(strings.TrimSpace(repoPath))
|
||||
|
||||
rr := strings.SplitN(repoPath, "/", 2)
|
||||
if len(rr) != 2 {
|
||||
return fail(ctx, "Invalid repository path", "Invalid repository path: %v", repoPath)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
username := strings.ToLower(rr[0])
|
||||
reponame := strings.ToLower(strings.TrimSuffix(rr[1], ".git"))
|
||||
username := rr[0]
|
||||
reponame := strings.TrimSuffix(rr[1], ".git")
|
||||
|
||||
// LowerCase and trim the repoPath as that's how they are stored.
|
||||
// This should be done after splitting the repoPath into username and reponame
|
||||
// so that username and reponame are not affected.
|
||||
repoPath = strings.ToLower(strings.TrimSpace(repoPath))
|
||||
|
||||
if alphaDashDotPattern.MatchString(reponame) {
|
||||
return fail(ctx, "Invalid repo name", "Invalid repo name: %s", reponame)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -688,8 +688,15 @@ func (c *Comment) LoadReactions(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (c *Comment) loadReview(ctx context.Context) (err error) {
|
||||
if c.ReviewID == 0 {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
if c.Review == nil {
|
||||
if c.Review, err = GetReviewByID(ctx, c.ReviewID); err != nil {
|
||||
// review request which has been replaced by actual reviews doesn't exist in database anymore, so ignorem them.
|
||||
if c.Type == CommentTypeReviewRequest {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -225,6 +225,10 @@ func (comments CommentList) loadAssignees(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|||
|
||||
for _, comment := range comments {
|
||||
comment.Assignee = assignees[comment.AssigneeID]
|
||||
if comment.Assignee == nil {
|
||||
comment.AssigneeID = user_model.GhostUserID
|
||||
comment.Assignee = user_model.NewGhostUser()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -430,7 +434,8 @@ func (comments CommentList) loadReviews(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|||
for _, comment := range comments {
|
||||
comment.Review = reviews[comment.ReviewID]
|
||||
if comment.Review == nil {
|
||||
if comment.ReviewID > 0 {
|
||||
// review request which has been replaced by actual reviews doesn't exist in database anymore, so don't log errors for them.
|
||||
if comment.ReviewID > 0 && comment.Type != CommentTypeReviewRequest {
|
||||
log.Error("comment with review id [%d] but has no review record", comment.ReviewID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -159,6 +159,14 @@ func (r *Review) LoadReviewer(ctx context.Context) (err error) {
|
|||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
r.Reviewer, err = user_model.GetPossibleUserByID(ctx, r.ReviewerID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
if !user_model.IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("GetPossibleUserByID [%d]: %w", r.ReviewerID, err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
r.ReviewerID = user_model.GhostUserID
|
||||
r.Reviewer = user_model.NewGhostUser()
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -285,8 +293,14 @@ func IsOfficialReviewerTeam(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, team *organizatio
|
|||
|
||||
// CreateReview creates a new review based on opts
|
||||
func CreateReview(ctx context.Context, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) {
|
||||
ctx, committer, err := db.TxContext(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
defer committer.Close()
|
||||
sess := db.GetEngine(ctx)
|
||||
|
||||
review := &Review{
|
||||
Type: opts.Type,
|
||||
Issue: opts.Issue,
|
||||
IssueID: opts.Issue.ID,
|
||||
Reviewer: opts.Reviewer,
|
||||
|
@ -296,15 +310,39 @@ func CreateReview(ctx context.Context, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error
|
|||
CommitID: opts.CommitID,
|
||||
Stale: opts.Stale,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if opts.Reviewer != nil {
|
||||
review.Type = opts.Type
|
||||
review.ReviewerID = opts.Reviewer.ID
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if review.Type != ReviewTypeRequest {
|
||||
review.Type = ReviewTypeRequest
|
||||
|
||||
reviewCond := builder.Eq{"reviewer_id": opts.Reviewer.ID, "issue_id": opts.Issue.ID}
|
||||
// make sure user review requests are cleared
|
||||
if opts.Type != ReviewTypePending {
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Where(reviewCond.And(builder.Eq{"type": ReviewTypeRequest})).Delete(new(Review)); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// make sure if the created review gets dismissed no old review surface
|
||||
// other types can be ignored, as they don't affect branch protection
|
||||
if opts.Type == ReviewTypeApprove || opts.Type == ReviewTypeReject {
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Where(reviewCond.And(builder.In("type", ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject))).
|
||||
Cols("dismissed").Update(&Review{Dismissed: true}); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} else if opts.ReviewerTeam != nil {
|
||||
review.Type = ReviewTypeRequest
|
||||
review.ReviewerTeamID = opts.ReviewerTeam.ID
|
||||
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("provide either reviewer or reviewer team")
|
||||
}
|
||||
return review, db.Insert(ctx, review)
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Insert(review); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
return review, committer.Commit()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GetCurrentReview returns the current pending review of reviewer for given issue
|
||||
|
@ -622,6 +660,9 @@ func AddReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer, doer *user_mo
|
|||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// func caller use the created comment to retrieve created review too.
|
||||
comment.Review = review
|
||||
|
||||
return comment, committer.Commit()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ func AssertSuccessfulInsert(t assert.TestingT, beans ...any) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// AssertCount assert the count of a bean
|
||||
func AssertCount(t assert.TestingT, bean, expected any) {
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCount(t, bean))
|
||||
func AssertCount(t assert.TestingT, bean, expected any) bool {
|
||||
return assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCount(t, bean))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// AssertInt64InRange assert value is in range [low, high]
|
||||
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ func GetCountByCond(t assert.TestingT, tableName string, cond builder.Cond) int6
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// AssertCountByCond test the count of database entries matching bean
|
||||
func AssertCountByCond(t assert.TestingT, tableName string, cond builder.Cond, expected int) {
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCountByCond(t, tableName, cond),
|
||||
func AssertCountByCond(t assert.TestingT, tableName string, cond builder.Cond, expected int) bool {
|
||||
return assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCountByCond(t, tableName, cond),
|
||||
"Failed consistency test, the counted bean (of table %s) was %+v", tableName, cond)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -315,12 +315,7 @@ func pushUpdateAddTags(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, gitRepo
|
|||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lowerTags := make([]string, 0, len(tags))
|
||||
for _, tag := range tags {
|
||||
lowerTags = append(lowerTags, strings.ToLower(tag))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
releases, err := repo_model.GetReleasesByRepoIDAndNames(ctx, repo.ID, lowerTags)
|
||||
releases, err := repo_model.GetReleasesByRepoIDAndNames(ctx, repo.ID, tags)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("GetReleasesByRepoIDAndNames: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -329,6 +324,11 @@ func pushUpdateAddTags(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, gitRepo
|
|||
relMap[rel.LowerTagName] = rel
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lowerTags := make([]string, 0, len(tags))
|
||||
for _, tag := range tags {
|
||||
lowerTags = append(lowerTags, strings.ToLower(tag))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
newReleases := make([]*repo_model.Release, 0, len(lowerTags)-len(relMap))
|
||||
|
||||
emailToUser := make(map[string]*user_model.User)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
|
|||
<div class="inline field {{if .Err_Visibility}}error{{end}}">
|
||||
<span class="inline required field"><label for="visibility">{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.visibility"}}</label></span>
|
||||
<div class="ui selection type dropdown">
|
||||
<input type="hidden" id="visibility" name="visibility" value="{{if .visibility}}{{.visibility}}{{else}}{{printf "%d" .DefaultUserVisibilityMode}}{{end}}">
|
||||
<input type="hidden" id="visibility" name="visibility" value="{{if .visibility}}{{printf "%d" .visibility}}{{else}}{{printf "%d" .DefaultUserVisibilityMode}}{{end}}">
|
||||
<div class="text">
|
||||
{{if .DefaultUserVisibilityMode.IsPublic}}{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.visibility.public"}}{{end}}
|
||||
{{if .DefaultUserVisibilityMode.IsLimited}}{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.visibility.limited"}}{{end}}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -13,11 +13,14 @@ import (
|
|||
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
||||
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
||||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
||||
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
||||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/json"
|
||||
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
|
||||
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
|
||||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
"xorm.io/builder"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAPIPullReview(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -305,3 +308,126 @@ func TestAPIPullReviewRequest(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodDelete, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers?token=%s", repo3.OwnerName, repo3.Name, pullIssue12.Index, token), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAPIPullReviewStayDismissed(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// This test against issue https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28542
|
||||
// where old reviews surface after a review request got dismissed.
|
||||
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
||||
pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
|
||||
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue.RepoID})
|
||||
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
|
||||
session2 := loginUser(t, user2.LoginName)
|
||||
token2 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session2, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
|
||||
user8 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 8})
|
||||
session8 := loginUser(t, user8.LoginName)
|
||||
token8 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session8, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
|
||||
|
||||
// user2 request user8
|
||||
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers?token=%s", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, token2), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
|
||||
Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName},
|
||||
})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check we have only one review request",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 1, 1, false)
|
||||
|
||||
// user2 request user8 again, it is expected to be ignored
|
||||
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers?token=%s", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, token2), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
|
||||
Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName},
|
||||
})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check we have only one review request, even after re-request it again",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 1, 1, false)
|
||||
|
||||
// user8 reviews it as accept
|
||||
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews?token=%s", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, token8), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
|
||||
Event: "APPROVED",
|
||||
Body: "lgtm",
|
||||
})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check we have one valid approval",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 0, 1, true)
|
||||
|
||||
// emulate of auto-dismiss lgtm on a protected branch that where a pull just got an update
|
||||
_, err := db.GetEngine(db.DefaultContext).Where("issue_id = ? AND reviewer_id = ?", pullIssue.ID, user8.ID).
|
||||
Cols("dismissed").Update(&issues_model.Review{Dismissed: true})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
// user2 request user8 again
|
||||
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers?token=%s", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, token2), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{
|
||||
Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName},
|
||||
})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check we have no valid approval and one review request",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 1, 2, false)
|
||||
|
||||
// user8 dismiss review
|
||||
_, err = issue_service.ReviewRequest(db.DefaultContext, pullIssue, user8, user8, false)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check new review request is now dismissed",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 0, 1, false)
|
||||
|
||||
// add a new valid approval
|
||||
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews?token=%s", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, token8), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
|
||||
Event: "APPROVED",
|
||||
Body: "lgtm",
|
||||
})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check that old reviews requests are deleted",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 0, 2, true)
|
||||
|
||||
// now add a change request witch should dismiss the approval
|
||||
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews?token=%s", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index, token8), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
|
||||
Event: "REQUEST_CHANGES",
|
||||
Body: "please change XYZ",
|
||||
})
|
||||
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewsCountCheck(t,
|
||||
"check that old reviews are dismissed",
|
||||
pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 2, 0, 3, false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func reviewsCountCheck(t *testing.T, name string, issueID, reviewerID int64, expectedDismissed, expectedRequested, expectedTotal int, expectApproval bool) {
|
||||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
|
||||
"issue_id": issueID,
|
||||
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
|
||||
"dismissed": true,
|
||||
}, expectedDismissed)
|
||||
|
||||
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
|
||||
"issue_id": issueID,
|
||||
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
|
||||
}, expectedTotal)
|
||||
|
||||
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
|
||||
"issue_id": issueID,
|
||||
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
|
||||
"type": issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest,
|
||||
}, expectedRequested)
|
||||
|
||||
approvalCount := 0
|
||||
if expectApproval {
|
||||
approvalCount = 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{
|
||||
"issue_id": issueID,
|
||||
"reviewer_id": reviewerID,
|
||||
"type": issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove,
|
||||
"dismissed": false,
|
||||
}, approvalCount)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue