- Backport #19457 - When 3-way merge is enabled for conflict checking, it has a new interesting behavior that it doesn't return any error when it found a conflict, so we change the condition to not check for the error, but instead check if conflictedfiles is populated, this fixes a issue whereby PR status wasn't correctly on conflicted PR's. - Refactor the mergeable property(which was incorrectly set and lead me this bug) to be more maintainable. - Add a dedicated test for conflicting checking, so it should prevent future issues with this. - Ref: Fix the latest error for https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/579 Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
297346a762
commit
09adc26eb6
4 changed files with 93 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ import (
|
||||||
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
|
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
|
||||||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/test"
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/test"
|
||||||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/pull"
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/pull"
|
||||||
|
repo_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository"
|
||||||
|
files_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository/files"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||||
"github.com/unknwon/i18n"
|
"github.com/unknwon/i18n"
|
||||||
|
@ -335,3 +337,74 @@ func TestCantMergeUnrelated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
gitRepo.Close()
|
gitRepo.Close()
|
||||||
})
|
})
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
func TestConflictChecking(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
||||||
|
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2}).(*user_model.User)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Create new clean repo to test conflict checking.
|
||||||
|
baseRepo, err := repo_service.CreateRepository(user, user, models.CreateRepoOptions{
|
||||||
|
Name: "conflict-checking",
|
||||||
|
Description: "Tempo repo",
|
||||||
|
AutoInit: true,
|
||||||
|
Readme: "Default",
|
||||||
|
DefaultBranch: "main",
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||||
|
assert.NotEmpty(t, baseRepo)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// create a commit on new branch.
|
||||||
|
_, err = files_service.CreateOrUpdateRepoFile(baseRepo, user, &files_service.UpdateRepoFileOptions{
|
||||||
|
TreePath: "important_file",
|
||||||
|
Message: "Add a important file",
|
||||||
|
Content: "Just a non-important file",
|
||||||
|
IsNewFile: true,
|
||||||
|
OldBranch: "main",
|
||||||
|
NewBranch: "important-secrets",
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// create a commit on main branch.
|
||||||
|
_, err = files_service.CreateOrUpdateRepoFile(baseRepo, user, &files_service.UpdateRepoFileOptions{
|
||||||
|
TreePath: "important_file",
|
||||||
|
Message: "Add a important file",
|
||||||
|
Content: "Not the same content :P",
|
||||||
|
IsNewFile: true,
|
||||||
|
OldBranch: "main",
|
||||||
|
NewBranch: "main",
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// create Pull to merge the important-secrets branch into main branch.
|
||||||
|
pullIssue := &models.Issue{
|
||||||
|
RepoID: baseRepo.ID,
|
||||||
|
Title: "PR with conflict!",
|
||||||
|
PosterID: user.ID,
|
||||||
|
Poster: user,
|
||||||
|
IsPull: true,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
pullRequest := &models.PullRequest{
|
||||||
|
HeadRepoID: baseRepo.ID,
|
||||||
|
BaseRepoID: baseRepo.ID,
|
||||||
|
HeadBranch: "important-secrets",
|
||||||
|
BaseBranch: "main",
|
||||||
|
HeadRepo: baseRepo,
|
||||||
|
BaseRepo: baseRepo,
|
||||||
|
Type: models.PullRequestGitea,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
err = pull.NewPullRequest(baseRepo, pullIssue, nil, nil, pullRequest, nil)
|
||||||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &models.Issue{Title: "PR with conflict!"}).(*models.Issue)
|
||||||
|
conflictingPR, err := models.GetPullRequestByIssueID(issue.ID)
|
||||||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Ensure conflictedFiles is populated.
|
||||||
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(conflictingPR.ConflictedFiles))
|
||||||
|
// Check if status is correct.
|
||||||
|
assert.Equal(t, models.PullRequestStatusConflict, conflictingPR.Status)
|
||||||
|
// Ensure that mergeable returns false
|
||||||
|
assert.False(t, conflictingPR.Mergeable())
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -697,3 +697,14 @@ func (pr *PullRequest) GetHeadBranchHTMLURL() string {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return pr.HeadRepo.HTMLURL() + "/src/branch/" + util.PathEscapeSegments(pr.HeadBranch)
|
return pr.HeadRepo.HTMLURL() + "/src/branch/" + util.PathEscapeSegments(pr.HeadBranch)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Mergeable returns if the pullrequest is mergeable.
|
||||||
|
func (pr *PullRequest) Mergeable() bool {
|
||||||
|
// If a pull request isn't mergable if it's:
|
||||||
|
// - Being conflict checked.
|
||||||
|
// - Has a conflict.
|
||||||
|
// - Received a error while being conflict checked.
|
||||||
|
// - Is a work-in-progress pull request.
|
||||||
|
return pr.Status != PullRequestStatusChecking && pr.Status != PullRequestStatusConflict &&
|
||||||
|
pr.Status != PullRequestStatusError && !pr.IsWorkInProgress()
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ func ToAPIPullRequest(pr *models.PullRequest, doer *user_model.User) *api.PullRe
|
||||||
PatchURL: pr.Issue.PatchURL(),
|
PatchURL: pr.Issue.PatchURL(),
|
||||||
HasMerged: pr.HasMerged,
|
HasMerged: pr.HasMerged,
|
||||||
MergeBase: pr.MergeBase,
|
MergeBase: pr.MergeBase,
|
||||||
|
Mergeable: pr.Mergeable(),
|
||||||
Deadline: apiIssue.Deadline,
|
Deadline: apiIssue.Deadline,
|
||||||
Created: pr.Issue.CreatedUnix.AsTimePtr(),
|
Created: pr.Issue.CreatedUnix.AsTimePtr(),
|
||||||
Updated: pr.Issue.UpdatedUnix.AsTimePtr(),
|
Updated: pr.Issue.UpdatedUnix.AsTimePtr(),
|
||||||
|
@ -190,10 +191,6 @@ func ToAPIPullRequest(pr *models.PullRequest, doer *user_model.User) *api.PullRe
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if pr.Status != models.PullRequestStatusChecking {
|
|
||||||
mergeable := !(pr.Status == models.PullRequestStatusConflict || pr.Status == models.PullRequestStatusError) && !pr.IsWorkInProgress()
|
|
||||||
apiPullRequest.Mergeable = mergeable
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
if pr.HasMerged {
|
if pr.HasMerged {
|
||||||
apiPullRequest.Merged = pr.MergedUnix.AsTimePtr()
|
apiPullRequest.Merged = pr.MergedUnix.AsTimePtr()
|
||||||
apiPullRequest.MergedCommitID = &pr.MergedCommitID
|
apiPullRequest.MergedCommitID = &pr.MergedCommitID
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -431,14 +431,16 @@ func checkConflicts(pr *models.PullRequest, gitRepo *git.Repository, tmpBasePath
|
||||||
return nil
|
return nil
|
||||||
})
|
})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// 8. If there is a conflict the `git apply` command will return a non-zero error code - so there will be a positive error.
|
// 9. Check if the found conflictedfiles is non-zero, "err" could be non-nil, so we should ignore it if we found conflicts.
|
||||||
if err != nil {
|
// Note: `"err" could be non-nil` is due that if enable 3-way merge, it doesn't return any error on found conflicts.
|
||||||
|
if len(pr.ConflictedFiles) > 0 {
|
||||||
if conflict {
|
if conflict {
|
||||||
pr.Status = models.PullRequestStatusConflict
|
pr.Status = models.PullRequestStatusConflict
|
||||||
log.Trace("Found %d files conflicted: %v", len(pr.ConflictedFiles), pr.ConflictedFiles)
|
log.Trace("Found %d files conflicted: %v", len(pr.ConflictedFiles), pr.ConflictedFiles)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return true, nil
|
return true, nil
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
} else if err != nil {
|
||||||
return false, fmt.Errorf("git apply --check: %v", err)
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("git apply --check: %v", err)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return false, nil
|
return false, nil
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue