Branch protection: Possibility to not use whitelist but allow anyone with write access (#9055)
* Possibility to not use whitelist but allow anyone with write access * fix existing test * rename migration function * Try to give a better name for migration step * Clear settings if higher level setting is not set * Move official reviews to db instead of counting approvals each time * migration * fix * fix migration * fix migration * Remove NOT NULL from EnableWhitelist as migration isn't possible * Fix migration, reviews are connected to issues. * Fix SQL query issues in GetReviewersByPullID. * Simplify function GetReviewersByIssueID * Handle reviewers that has been deleted * Ensure reviews for test is in a well defined order * Only clear and set official reviews when it is an approve or reject.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6460284085
commit
bac4b78e09
20 changed files with 389 additions and 171 deletions
|
@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ func doProtectBranch(ctx APITestContext, branch string, userToWhitelist string)
|
|||
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/%s/%s/settings/branches/%s", url.PathEscape(ctx.Username), url.PathEscape(ctx.Reponame), url.PathEscape(branch)), map[string]string{
|
||||
"_csrf": csrf,
|
||||
"protected": "on",
|
||||
"enable_push": "whitelist",
|
||||
"enable_whitelist": "on",
|
||||
"whitelist_users": strconv.FormatInt(user.ID, 10),
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ type ProtectedBranch struct {
|
|||
MergeWhitelistTeamIDs []int64 `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
|
||||
EnableStatusCheck bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
StatusCheckContexts []string `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
|
||||
EnableApprovalsWhitelist bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs []int64 `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
|
||||
ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs []int64 `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
|
||||
RequiredApprovals int64 `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"`
|
||||
|
@ -53,10 +54,25 @@ func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) IsProtected() bool {
|
|||
|
||||
// CanUserPush returns if some user could push to this protected branch
|
||||
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) CanUserPush(userID int64) bool {
|
||||
if !protectBranch.EnableWhitelist {
|
||||
if !protectBranch.CanPush {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !protectBranch.EnableWhitelist {
|
||||
if user, err := GetUserByID(userID); err != nil {
|
||||
log.Error("GetUserByID: %v", err)
|
||||
return false
|
||||
} else if repo, err := GetRepositoryByID(protectBranch.RepoID); err != nil {
|
||||
log.Error("GetRepositoryByID: %v", err)
|
||||
return false
|
||||
} else if writeAccess, err := HasAccessUnit(user, repo, UnitTypeCode, AccessModeWrite); err != nil {
|
||||
log.Error("HasAccessUnit: %v", err)
|
||||
return false
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return writeAccess
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if base.Int64sContains(protectBranch.WhitelistUserIDs, userID) {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -95,6 +111,38 @@ func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) CanUserMerge(userID int64) bool {
|
|||
return in
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// IsUserOfficialReviewer check if user is official reviewer for the branch (counts towards required approvals)
|
||||
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) IsUserOfficialReviewer(user *User) (bool, error) {
|
||||
return protectBranch.isUserOfficialReviewer(x, user)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) isUserOfficialReviewer(e Engine, user *User) (bool, error) {
|
||||
repo, err := getRepositoryByID(e, protectBranch.RepoID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !protectBranch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist {
|
||||
// Anyone with write access is considered official reviewer
|
||||
writeAccess, err := hasAccessUnit(e, user, repo, UnitTypeCode, AccessModeWrite)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
return writeAccess, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if base.Int64sContains(protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs, user.ID) {
|
||||
return true, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inTeam, err := isUserInTeams(e, user.ID, protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return inTeam, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// HasEnoughApprovals returns true if pr has enough granted approvals.
|
||||
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) HasEnoughApprovals(pr *PullRequest) bool {
|
||||
if protectBranch.RequiredApprovals == 0 {
|
||||
|
@ -105,30 +153,16 @@ func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) HasEnoughApprovals(pr *PullRequest) bool {
|
|||
|
||||
// GetGrantedApprovalsCount returns the number of granted approvals for pr. A granted approval must be authored by a user in an approval whitelist.
|
||||
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) GetGrantedApprovalsCount(pr *PullRequest) int64 {
|
||||
reviews, err := GetReviewersByPullID(pr.IssueID)
|
||||
approvals, err := x.Where("issue_id = ?", pr.Issue.ID).
|
||||
And("type = ?", ReviewTypeApprove).
|
||||
And("official = ?", true).
|
||||
Count(new(Review))
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Error("GetReviewersByPullID: %v", err)
|
||||
log.Error("GetGrantedApprovalsCount: %v", err)
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
approvals := int64(0)
|
||||
userIDs := make([]int64, 0)
|
||||
for _, review := range reviews {
|
||||
if review.Type != ReviewTypeApprove {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
if base.Int64sContains(protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs, review.ID) {
|
||||
approvals++
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
userIDs = append(userIDs, review.ID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
approvalTeamCount, err := UsersInTeamsCount(userIDs, protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Error("UsersInTeamsCount: %v", err)
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
return approvalTeamCount + approvals
|
||||
return approvals
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GetProtectedBranchByRepoID getting protected branch by repo ID
|
||||
|
@ -139,8 +173,12 @@ func GetProtectedBranchByRepoID(repoID int64) ([]*ProtectedBranch, error) {
|
|||
|
||||
// GetProtectedBranchBy getting protected branch by ID/Name
|
||||
func GetProtectedBranchBy(repoID int64, branchName string) (*ProtectedBranch, error) {
|
||||
return getProtectedBranchBy(x, repoID, branchName)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func getProtectedBranchBy(e Engine, repoID int64, branchName string) (*ProtectedBranch, error) {
|
||||
rel := &ProtectedBranch{RepoID: repoID, BranchName: branchName}
|
||||
has, err := x.Get(rel)
|
||||
has, err := e.Get(rel)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -44,32 +44,32 @@
|
|||
reviewer_id: 2
|
||||
issue_id: 3
|
||||
content: "New review 3"
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684810
|
||||
created_unix: 946684810
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684811
|
||||
created_unix: 946684811
|
||||
-
|
||||
id: 7
|
||||
type: 3
|
||||
reviewer_id: 3
|
||||
issue_id: 3
|
||||
content: "New review 4"
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684810
|
||||
created_unix: 946684810
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684812
|
||||
created_unix: 946684812
|
||||
-
|
||||
id: 8
|
||||
type: 1
|
||||
reviewer_id: 4
|
||||
issue_id: 3
|
||||
content: "New review 5"
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684810
|
||||
created_unix: 946684810
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684813
|
||||
created_unix: 946684813
|
||||
-
|
||||
id: 9
|
||||
type: 3
|
||||
reviewer_id: 2
|
||||
issue_id: 3
|
||||
content: "New review 3 rejected"
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684810
|
||||
created_unix: 946684810
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684814
|
||||
created_unix: 946684814
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
id: 10
|
||||
|
@ -77,5 +77,5 @@
|
|||
reviewer_id: 100
|
||||
issue_id: 3
|
||||
content: "a deleted user's review"
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684810
|
||||
created_unix: 946684810
|
||||
updated_unix: 946684815
|
||||
created_unix: 946684815
|
|
@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ var migrations = []Migration{
|
|||
NewMigration("add can_create_org_repo to team", addCanCreateOrgRepoColumnForTeam),
|
||||
// v110 -> v111
|
||||
NewMigration("change review content type to text", changeReviewContentToText),
|
||||
// v111 -> v112
|
||||
NewMigration("update branch protection for can push and whitelist enable", addBranchProtectionCanPushAndEnableWhitelist),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Migrate database to current version
|
||||
|
|
87
models/migrations/v111.go
Normal file
87
models/migrations/v111.go
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
|||
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
||||
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
|
||||
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
||||
|
||||
package migrations
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
|
||||
|
||||
"xorm.io/xorm"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func addBranchProtectionCanPushAndEnableWhitelist(x *xorm.Engine) error {
|
||||
|
||||
type ProtectedBranch struct {
|
||||
CanPush bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
EnableApprovalsWhitelist bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
RequiredApprovals int64 `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type Review struct {
|
||||
ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"`
|
||||
Official bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sess := x.NewSession()
|
||||
defer sess.Close()
|
||||
|
||||
if err := sess.Sync2(new(ProtectedBranch)); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := sess.Sync2(new(Review)); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `protected_branch` SET `can_push` = `enable_whitelist`"); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `protected_branch` SET `enable_approvals_whitelist` = ? WHERE `required_approvals` > ?", true, 0); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var pageSize int64 = 20
|
||||
qresult, err := sess.QueryInterface("SELECT max(id) as max_id FROM issue")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
var totalIssues int64
|
||||
totalIssues, ok := qresult[0]["max_id"].(int64)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
// If there are no issues at all we ignore it
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
totalPages := totalIssues / pageSize
|
||||
|
||||
// Find latest review of each user in each pull request, and set official field if appropriate
|
||||
reviews := []*models.Review{}
|
||||
var page int64
|
||||
for page = 0; page <= totalPages; page++ {
|
||||
if err := sess.SQL("SELECT * FROM review WHERE id IN (SELECT max(id) as id FROM review WHERE issue_id > ? AND issue_id <= ? AND type in (?, ?) GROUP BY issue_id, reviewer_id)",
|
||||
page*pageSize, (page+1)*pageSize, models.ReviewTypeApprove, models.ReviewTypeReject).
|
||||
Find(&reviews); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, review := range reviews {
|
||||
if err := review.LoadAttributes(); err != nil {
|
||||
// Error might occur if user or issue doesn't exist, ignore it.
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
official, err := models.IsOfficialReviewer(review.Issue, review.Reviewer)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
// Branch might not be proteced or other error, ignore it.
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
review.Official = official
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("official").Update(review); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return sess.Commit()
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -914,7 +914,11 @@ func RemoveTeamMember(team *Team, userID int64) error {
|
|||
|
||||
// IsUserInTeams returns if a user in some teams
|
||||
func IsUserInTeams(userID int64, teamIDs []int64) (bool, error) {
|
||||
return x.Where("uid=?", userID).In("team_id", teamIDs).Exist(new(TeamUser))
|
||||
return isUserInTeams(x, userID, teamIDs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func isUserInTeams(e Engine, userID int64, teamIDs []int64) (bool, error) {
|
||||
return e.Where("uid=?", userID).In("team_id", teamIDs).Exist(new(TeamUser))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// UsersInTeamsCount counts the number of users which are in userIDs and teamIDs
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -159,16 +159,20 @@ func (pr *PullRequest) loadIssue(e Engine) (err error) {
|
|||
|
||||
// LoadProtectedBranch loads the protected branch of the base branch
|
||||
func (pr *PullRequest) LoadProtectedBranch() (err error) {
|
||||
return pr.loadProtectedBranch(x)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (pr *PullRequest) loadProtectedBranch(e Engine) (err error) {
|
||||
if pr.BaseRepo == nil {
|
||||
if pr.BaseRepoID == 0 {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
pr.BaseRepo, err = GetRepositoryByID(pr.BaseRepoID)
|
||||
pr.BaseRepo, err = getRepositoryByID(e, pr.BaseRepoID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pr.ProtectedBranch, err = GetProtectedBranchBy(pr.BaseRepo.ID, pr.BaseBranch)
|
||||
pr.ProtectedBranch, err = getProtectedBranchBy(e, pr.BaseRepo.ID, pr.BaseBranch)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
130
models/review.go
130
models/review.go
|
@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ import (
|
|||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
|
||||
|
||||
"xorm.io/builder"
|
||||
"xorm.io/core"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// ReviewType defines the sort of feedback a review gives
|
||||
|
@ -53,6 +52,8 @@ type Review struct {
|
|||
Issue *Issue `xorm:"-"`
|
||||
IssueID int64 `xorm:"index"`
|
||||
Content string `xorm:"TEXT"`
|
||||
// Official is a review made by an assigned approver (counts towards approval)
|
||||
Official bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
|
||||
CreatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"INDEX created"`
|
||||
UpdatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"INDEX updated"`
|
||||
|
@ -122,23 +123,6 @@ func GetReviewByID(id int64) (*Review, error) {
|
|||
return getReviewByID(x, id)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func getUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID(e Engine, prID int64) (reviews []*Review, err error) {
|
||||
reviews = make([]*Review, 0)
|
||||
if err := e.
|
||||
Where("issue_id = ? AND type = ?", prID, ReviewTypeApprove).
|
||||
OrderBy("updated_unix").
|
||||
GroupBy("reviewer_id").
|
||||
Find(&reviews); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GetUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID returns all reviews submitted for a specific pull request
|
||||
func GetUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID(prID int64) ([]*Review, error) {
|
||||
return getUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID(x, prID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FindReviewOptions represent possible filters to find reviews
|
||||
type FindReviewOptions struct {
|
||||
Type ReviewType
|
||||
|
@ -180,6 +164,27 @@ type CreateReviewOptions struct {
|
|||
Type ReviewType
|
||||
Issue *Issue
|
||||
Reviewer *User
|
||||
Official bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// IsOfficialReviewer check if reviewer can make official reviews in issue (counts towards required approvals)
|
||||
func IsOfficialReviewer(issue *Issue, reviewer *User) (bool, error) {
|
||||
return isOfficialReviewer(x, issue, reviewer)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func isOfficialReviewer(e Engine, issue *Issue, reviewer *User) (bool, error) {
|
||||
pr, err := getPullRequestByIssueID(e, issue.ID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err = pr.loadProtectedBranch(e); err != nil {
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
if pr.ProtectedBranch == nil {
|
||||
return false, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return pr.ProtectedBranch.isUserOfficialReviewer(e, reviewer)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func createReview(e Engine, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) {
|
||||
|
@ -190,6 +195,7 @@ func createReview(e Engine, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) {
|
|||
Reviewer: opts.Reviewer,
|
||||
ReviewerID: opts.Reviewer.ID,
|
||||
Content: opts.Content,
|
||||
Official: opts.Official,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := e.Insert(review); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
|
@ -255,6 +261,8 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
|
|||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var official = false
|
||||
|
||||
review, err := getCurrentReview(sess, doer, issue)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
if !IsErrReviewNotExist(err) {
|
||||
|
@ -265,12 +273,24 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
|
|||
return nil, nil, ContentEmptyErr{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if reviewType == ReviewTypeApprove || reviewType == ReviewTypeReject {
|
||||
// Only reviewers latest review of type approve and reject shall count as "official", so existing reviews needs to be cleared
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `review` SET official=? WHERE issue_id=? AND reviewer_id=?", false, issue.ID, doer.ID); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
official, err = isOfficialReviewer(sess, issue, doer)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// No current review. Create a new one!
|
||||
review, err = createReview(sess, CreateReviewOptions{
|
||||
Type: reviewType,
|
||||
Issue: issue,
|
||||
Reviewer: doer,
|
||||
Content: content,
|
||||
Official: official,
|
||||
})
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
|
@ -283,10 +303,23 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
|
|||
return nil, nil, ContentEmptyErr{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if reviewType == ReviewTypeApprove || reviewType == ReviewTypeReject {
|
||||
// Only reviewers latest review of type approve and reject shall count as "official", so existing reviews needs to be cleared
|
||||
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `review` SET official=? WHERE issue_id=? AND reviewer_id=?", false, issue.ID, doer.ID); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
official, err = isOfficialReviewer(sess, issue, doer)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
review.Official = official
|
||||
review.Issue = issue
|
||||
review.Content = content
|
||||
review.Type = reviewType
|
||||
if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("content, type").Update(review); err != nil {
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("content, type, official").Update(review); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -307,46 +340,33 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
|
|||
return review, comm, sess.Commit()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// PullReviewersWithType represents the type used to display a review overview
|
||||
type PullReviewersWithType struct {
|
||||
User `xorm:"extends"`
|
||||
Type ReviewType
|
||||
ReviewUpdatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"review_updated_unix"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
// GetReviewersByIssueID gets the latest review of each reviewer for a pull request
|
||||
func GetReviewersByIssueID(issueID int64) (reviews []*Review, err error) {
|
||||
reviewsUnfiltered := []*Review{}
|
||||
|
||||
// GetReviewersByPullID gets all reviewers for a pull request with the statuses
|
||||
func GetReviewersByPullID(pullID int64) (issueReviewers []*PullReviewersWithType, err error) {
|
||||
irs := []*PullReviewersWithType{}
|
||||
if x.Dialect().DBType() == core.MSSQL {
|
||||
err = x.SQL(`SELECT [user].*, review.type, review.review_updated_unix FROM
|
||||
(SELECT review.id, review.type, review.reviewer_id, max(review.updated_unix) as review_updated_unix
|
||||
FROM review WHERE review.issue_id=? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)
|
||||
GROUP BY review.id, review.type, review.reviewer_id) as review
|
||||
INNER JOIN [user] ON review.reviewer_id = [user].id ORDER BY review_updated_unix DESC`,
|
||||
pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
|
||||
Find(&irs)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
err = x.Select("`user`.*, review.type, max(review.updated_unix) as review_updated_unix").
|
||||
Table("review").
|
||||
Join("INNER", "`user`", "review.reviewer_id = `user`.id").
|
||||
Where("review.issue_id = ? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)",
|
||||
pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
|
||||
GroupBy("`user`.id, review.type").
|
||||
OrderBy("review_updated_unix DESC").
|
||||
Find(&irs)
|
||||
sess := x.NewSession()
|
||||
defer sess.Close()
|
||||
if err := sess.Begin(); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We need to group our results by user id _and_ review type, otherwise the query fails when using postgresql.
|
||||
// But becaus we're doing this, we need to manually filter out multiple reviews of different types by the
|
||||
// same person because we only want to show the newest review grouped by user. Thats why we're using a map here.
|
||||
issueReviewers = []*PullReviewersWithType{}
|
||||
usersInArray := make(map[int64]bool)
|
||||
for _, ir := range irs {
|
||||
if !usersInArray[ir.ID] {
|
||||
issueReviewers = append(issueReviewers, ir)
|
||||
usersInArray[ir.ID] = true
|
||||
// Get latest review of each reviwer, sorted in order they were made
|
||||
if err := sess.SQL("SELECT * FROM review WHERE id IN (SELECT max(id) as id FROM review WHERE issue_id = ? AND type in (?, ?) GROUP BY issue_id, reviewer_id) ORDER BY review.updated_unix ASC",
|
||||
issueID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
|
||||
Find(&reviewsUnfiltered); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Load reviewer and skip if user is deleted
|
||||
for _, review := range reviewsUnfiltered {
|
||||
if err := review.loadReviewer(sess); err != nil {
|
||||
if !IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
reviews = append(reviews, review)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
return reviews, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ func TestCreateReview(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &Review{Content: "New Review"})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestGetReviewersByPullID(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestGetReviewersByIssueID(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, PrepareTestDatabase())
|
||||
|
||||
issue := AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &Issue{ID: 3}).(*Issue)
|
||||
|
@ -106,24 +106,29 @@ func TestGetReviewersByPullID(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
user3 := AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &User{ID: 3}).(*User)
|
||||
user4 := AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &User{ID: 4}).(*User)
|
||||
|
||||
expectedReviews := []*PullReviewersWithType{}
|
||||
expectedReviews = append(expectedReviews, &PullReviewersWithType{
|
||||
User: *user2,
|
||||
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
|
||||
ReviewUpdatedUnix: 946684810,
|
||||
},
|
||||
&PullReviewersWithType{
|
||||
User: *user3,
|
||||
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
|
||||
ReviewUpdatedUnix: 946684810,
|
||||
expectedReviews := []*Review{}
|
||||
expectedReviews = append(expectedReviews,
|
||||
&Review{
|
||||
Reviewer: user3,
|
||||
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
|
||||
UpdatedUnix: 946684812,
|
||||
},
|
||||
&PullReviewersWithType{
|
||||
User: *user4,
|
||||
Type: ReviewTypeApprove,
|
||||
ReviewUpdatedUnix: 946684810,
|
||||
&Review{
|
||||
Reviewer: user4,
|
||||
Type: ReviewTypeApprove,
|
||||
UpdatedUnix: 946684813,
|
||||
},
|
||||
&Review{
|
||||
Reviewer: user2,
|
||||
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
|
||||
UpdatedUnix: 946684814,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
allReviews, err := GetReviewersByPullID(issue.ID)
|
||||
allReviews, err := GetReviewersByIssueID(issue.ID)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews, allReviews)
|
||||
for i, review := range allReviews {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Reviewer, review.Reviewer)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Type, review.Type)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].UpdatedUnix, review.UpdatedUnix)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -157,19 +157,20 @@ func (f *RepoSettingForm) Validate(ctx *macaron.Context, errs binding.Errors) bi
|
|||
|
||||
// ProtectBranchForm form for changing protected branch settings
|
||||
type ProtectBranchForm struct {
|
||||
Protected bool
|
||||
EnableWhitelist bool
|
||||
WhitelistUsers string
|
||||
WhitelistTeams string
|
||||
WhitelistDeployKeys bool
|
||||
EnableMergeWhitelist bool
|
||||
MergeWhitelistUsers string
|
||||
MergeWhitelistTeams string
|
||||
EnableStatusCheck bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
StatusCheckContexts []string
|
||||
RequiredApprovals int64
|
||||
ApprovalsWhitelistUsers string
|
||||
ApprovalsWhitelistTeams string
|
||||
Protected bool
|
||||
EnablePush string
|
||||
WhitelistUsers string
|
||||
WhitelistTeams string
|
||||
WhitelistDeployKeys bool
|
||||
EnableMergeWhitelist bool
|
||||
MergeWhitelistUsers string
|
||||
MergeWhitelistTeams string
|
||||
EnableStatusCheck bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
|
||||
StatusCheckContexts []string
|
||||
RequiredApprovals int64
|
||||
EnableApprovalsWhitelist bool
|
||||
ApprovalsWhitelistUsers string
|
||||
ApprovalsWhitelistTeams string
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate validates the fields
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1382,9 +1382,13 @@ settings.protected_branch_can_push_yes = You can push
|
|||
settings.protected_branch_can_push_no = You can not push
|
||||
settings.branch_protection = Branch Protection for Branch '<b>%s</b>'
|
||||
settings.protect_this_branch = Enable Branch Protection
|
||||
settings.protect_this_branch_desc = Prevent deletion and disable any Git pushing to the branch.
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_committers = Enable Push Whitelist
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_committers_desc = Allow whitelisted users or teams to push to this branch (but not force push).
|
||||
settings.protect_this_branch_desc = Prevents deletion and restricts Git pushing and merging to the branch.
|
||||
settings.protect_disable_push = Disable Push
|
||||
settings.protect_disable_push_desc = No pushing will be allowed to this branch.
|
||||
settings.protect_enable_push = Enable Push
|
||||
settings.protect_enable_push_desc = Anyone with write access will be allowed to push to this branch (but not force push).
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_committers = Whitelist Restricted Push
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_committers_desc = Only whitelisted users or teams will be allowed to push to this branch (but not force push).
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_deploy_keys = Whitelist deploy keys with write access to push
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_users = Whitelisted users for pushing:
|
||||
settings.protect_whitelist_search_users = Search users…
|
||||
|
@ -1398,7 +1402,9 @@ settings.protect_check_status_contexts = Enable Status Check
|
|||
settings.protect_check_status_contexts_desc = Require status checks to pass before merging Choose which status checks must pass before branches can be merged into a branch that matches this rule. When enabled, commits must first be pushed to another branch, then merged or pushed directly to a branch that matches this rule after status checks have passed. If no contexts are selected, the last commit must be successful regardless of context.
|
||||
settings.protect_check_status_contexts_list = Status checks found in the last week for this repository
|
||||
settings.protect_required_approvals = Required approvals:
|
||||
settings.protect_required_approvals_desc = Allow only to merge pull request with enough positive reviews of whitelisted users or teams.
|
||||
settings.protect_required_approvals_desc = Allow only to merge pull request with enough positive reviews.
|
||||
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled = Restrict approvals to whitelisted users or teams
|
||||
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled_desc = Only reviews from whitelisted users or teams will count to the required approvals. Without approval whitelist, reviews from anyone with write access count to the required approvals.
|
||||
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_users = Whitelisted reviewers:
|
||||
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_teams = Whitelisted teams for reviews:
|
||||
settings.add_protected_branch = Enable protection
|
||||
|
|
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ func HookPreReceive(ctx *macaron.Context) {
|
|||
|
||||
canPush := false
|
||||
if isDeployKey {
|
||||
canPush = protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys
|
||||
canPush = protectBranch.CanPush && (!protectBranch.EnableWhitelist || protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
canPush = protectBranch.CanUserPush(userID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -935,9 +935,9 @@ func ViewIssue(ctx *context.Context) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsPullBranchDeletable"] = canDelete && pull.HeadRepo != nil && git.IsBranchExist(pull.HeadRepo.RepoPath(), pull.HeadBranch)
|
||||
|
||||
ctx.Data["PullReviewersWithType"], err = models.GetReviewersByPullID(issue.ID)
|
||||
ctx.Data["PullReviewers"], err = models.GetReviewersByIssueID(issue.ID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
ctx.ServerError("GetReviewersByPullID", err)
|
||||
ctx.ServerError("GetReviewersByIssueID", err)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -196,32 +196,55 @@ func SettingsProtectedBranchPost(ctx *context.Context, f auth.ProtectBranchForm)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var whitelistUsers, whitelistTeams, mergeWhitelistUsers, mergeWhitelistTeams, approvalsWhitelistUsers, approvalsWhitelistTeams []int64
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = f.EnableWhitelist
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistUsers) != "" {
|
||||
whitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistUsers, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistTeams) != "" {
|
||||
whitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistTeams, ","))
|
||||
switch f.EnablePush {
|
||||
case "all":
|
||||
protectBranch.CanPush = true
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = false
|
||||
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = false
|
||||
case "whitelist":
|
||||
protectBranch.CanPush = true
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = true
|
||||
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = f.WhitelistDeployKeys
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistUsers) != "" {
|
||||
whitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistUsers, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistTeams) != "" {
|
||||
whitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistTeams, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
protectBranch.CanPush = false
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = false
|
||||
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableMergeWhitelist = f.EnableMergeWhitelist
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistUsers) != "" {
|
||||
mergeWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistUsers, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistTeams) != "" {
|
||||
mergeWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistTeams, ","))
|
||||
if f.EnableMergeWhitelist {
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistUsers) != "" {
|
||||
mergeWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistUsers, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistTeams) != "" {
|
||||
mergeWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistTeams, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableStatusCheck = f.EnableStatusCheck
|
||||
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = f.StatusCheckContexts
|
||||
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = f.WhitelistDeployKeys
|
||||
if f.EnableStatusCheck {
|
||||
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = f.StatusCheckContexts
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protectBranch.RequiredApprovals = f.RequiredApprovals
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers) != "" {
|
||||
approvalsWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams) != "" {
|
||||
approvalsWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams, ","))
|
||||
protectBranch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist = f.EnableApprovalsWhitelist
|
||||
if f.EnableApprovalsWhitelist {
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers) != "" {
|
||||
approvalsWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams) != "" {
|
||||
approvalsWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams, ","))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = models.UpdateProtectBranch(ctx.Repo.Repository, protectBranch, models.WhitelistOptions{
|
||||
UserIDs: whitelistUsers,
|
||||
TeamIDs: whitelistTeams,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(doer *models.User, issue *models.Issue, line int64, conte
|
|||
Type: models.ReviewTypePending,
|
||||
Reviewer: doer,
|
||||
Issue: issue,
|
||||
Official: false,
|
||||
})
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{{if gt (len .PullReviewersWithType) 0}}
|
||||
{{if gt (len .PullReviewers) 0}}
|
||||
<div class="comment box">
|
||||
<div class="content">
|
||||
<div class="ui segment">
|
||||
<h4>{{$.i18n.Tr "repo.issues.review.reviewers"}}</h4>
|
||||
{{range .PullReviewersWithType}}
|
||||
{{ $createdStr:= TimeSinceUnix .ReviewUpdatedUnix $.Lang }}
|
||||
{{range .PullReviewers}}
|
||||
{{ $createdStr:= TimeSinceUnix .UpdatedUnix $.Lang }}
|
||||
<div class="ui divider"></div>
|
||||
<div class="review-item">
|
||||
<span class="type-icon text {{if eq .Type 1}}green
|
||||
|
@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
|
|||
{{else}}grey{{end}}">
|
||||
<span class="octicon octicon-{{.Type.Icon}}"></span>
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
<a class="ui avatar image" href="{{.HomeLink}}">
|
||||
<img src="{{.RelAvatarLink}}">
|
||||
<a class="ui avatar image" href="{{.Reviewer.HomeLink}}">
|
||||
<img src="{{.Reviewer.RelAvatarLink}}">
|
||||
</a>
|
||||
<span class="text grey"><a href="{{.HomeLink}}">{{.Name}}</a>
|
||||
<span class="text grey"><a href="{{.Reviewer.HomeLink}}">{{.Reviewer.Name}}</a>
|
||||
{{if eq .Type 1}}
|
||||
{{$.i18n.Tr "repo.issues.review.approve" $createdStr | Safe}}
|
||||
{{else if eq .Type 2}}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -19,8 +19,22 @@
|
|||
</div>
|
||||
<div id="protection_box" class="fields {{if not .Branch.IsProtected}}disabled{{end}}">
|
||||
<div class="field">
|
||||
<div class="ui checkbox">
|
||||
<input class="enable-whitelist" name="enable_whitelist" type="checkbox" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if .Branch.EnableWhitelist}}checked{{end}}>
|
||||
<div class="ui radio checkbox">
|
||||
<input name="enable_push" type="radio" value="none" class="disable-whitelist" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if not .Branch.CanPush}}checked{{end}}>
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_disable_push"}}</label>
|
||||
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_disable_push_desc"}}</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="field">
|
||||
<div class="ui radio checkbox">
|
||||
<input name="enable_push" type="radio" value="all" class="disable-whitelist" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if and (.Branch.CanPush) (not .Branch.EnableWhitelist)}}checked{{end}}>
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_enable_push"}}</label>
|
||||
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_enable_push_desc"}}</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="field">
|
||||
<div class="ui radio checkbox">
|
||||
<input name="enable_push" type="radio" value="whitelist" class="enable-whitelist" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if and (.Branch.CanPush) (.Branch.EnableWhitelist)}}checked{{end}}>
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_committers"}}</label>
|
||||
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_committers_desc"}}</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
@ -148,7 +162,14 @@
|
|||
<input name="required_approvals" id="required-approvals" type="number" value="{{.Branch.RequiredApprovals}}">
|
||||
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_required_approvals_desc"}}</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="fields">
|
||||
<div class="field">
|
||||
<div class="ui checkbox">
|
||||
<input class="enable-whitelist" name="enable_approvals_whitelist" type="checkbox" data-target="#approvals_whitelist_box" {{if .Branch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist}}checked{{end}}>
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled"}}</label>
|
||||
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled_desc"}}</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div id="approvals_whitelist_box" class="fields {{if not .Branch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist}}disabled{{end}}">
|
||||
<div class="whitelist field">
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_users"}}</label>
|
||||
<div class="ui multiple search selection dropdown">
|
||||
|
@ -164,24 +185,24 @@
|
|||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{{if .Owner.IsOrganization}}
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
<div class="whitelist field">
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_teams"}}</label>
|
||||
<div class="ui multiple search selection dropdown">
|
||||
<input type="hidden" name="approvals_whitelist_teams" value="{{.approvals_whitelist_teams}}">
|
||||
<div class="default text">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_search_teams"}}</div>
|
||||
<div class="menu">
|
||||
{{range .Teams}}
|
||||
<div class="item" data-value="{{.ID}}">
|
||||
<i class="octicon octicon-jersey"></i>
|
||||
{{.Name}}
|
||||
{{if .Owner.IsOrganization}}
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
<div class="whitelist field">
|
||||
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_teams"}}</label>
|
||||
<div class="ui multiple search selection dropdown">
|
||||
<input type="hidden" name="approvals_whitelist_teams" value="{{.approvals_whitelist_teams}}">
|
||||
<div class="default text">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_search_teams"}}</div>
|
||||
<div class="menu">
|
||||
{{range .Teams}}
|
||||
<div class="item" data-value="{{.ID}}">
|
||||
<i class="octicon octicon-jersey"></i>
|
||||
{{.Name}}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{{end}}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{{end}}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{{end}}
|
||||
{{end}}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1043,6 +1043,11 @@ function initRepository() {
|
|||
$($(this).data('target')).addClass('disabled');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
$('.disable-whitelist').change(function () {
|
||||
if (this.checked) {
|
||||
$($(this).data('target')).addClass('disabled');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue